Index 2024
43/ 180
Score : 71.6
Political indicator
47
63.13
Economic indicator
70
48.18
Legislative indicator
30
78.25
Social indicator
33
78.57
Security indicator
34
89.88
Index 2023
49/ 180
Score : 70.61
Political indicator
53
63.75
Economic indicator
76
48.53
Legislative indicator
48
73.82
Social indicator
32
82.95
Security indicator
46
83.98

Despite a pluralistic environment, the media remain polarised. The country is facing an unprecedented level of disinformation and hate speech, especially over the Nagorno-Karabakh territorial dispute and the ongoing threat of war with Azerbaijan.

Media landscape

Social media, accessed daily by two-thirds of the population, is the main source of information. Many new media outlets have sprung up since the 2018 “Velvet Revolution” and independent news sites such as Civilnet.am, hetq.am, Factor.am and Azatutyun.am are thriving and are fulfilling an independent watchdog role that is essential in a democracy. Nevertheless, most broadcast and print media, affiliated with major political and commercial interests, continue to face pressure concerning their editorial policy.

Political context

The polarisation of the media mirrors that of the political scene: many media outlets are close to political leaders who emerged after 2018, while others remain loyal to former oligarchs. Only a handful of media demonstrate independence. Two political topics are especially sensitive: the ethnic cleansing of Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh and the strained relations between Armenia and Russia. Some political groups carry out disinformation operations and target journalists.

Legal framework

Despite the decriminalisation of defamation and the implementation of legislation that guarantees the transparency of media ownership, the legal framework that regulates the sector does not sufficiently protect freedom of the press, nor does it follow European standards. Recent reforms have not resolved problems posed by disinformation and gag orders. Access to state-held information is limited by the government (refusal to respond, delays, etc.)

Economic context

The majority of media are controlled by people close to political movements or are supported by influential public figures. Few outlets have adopted paid subscription models, and the advertising market remains under-developed, which limits the financial independence of privately owned media. Meanwhile, state-owned media refrain from any criticism of the government.

Sociocultural context

As a profession, journalism is disparaged and subject to especially troubling hate speech. Anti-media rhetoric from political elites, who accuse journalists of “corruption” and of being in the service of their adversaries, creates a climate of intolerance that hinders reporters’ work. They are constantly insulted, assaulted and subject to abusive defamation proceedings, which reinforces self-censorship.

Safety

Clashes on the border with Azerbaijan complicate the work of journalists. Furthermore, journalists are often subjected to pressure, insults and violence by both ruling party officials and opposition politicians, as well as their supporters – whether in Parliament, in the street, or on social media. In general, violence against journalists goes unpunished.